The Smartest AI
Isn't One Model.
It's All of Them.
Four of the world's top AI models compete on every question. They review each other anonymously. No single judge. No bias. The best answer wins, then gets even better.
We Removed the Judge
Most multi-model AI systems use a single model to evaluate the others. That model's training, style preferences, and blind spots become the filter for every answer. We built something different.
The Industry Standard
One dedicated AI evaluates the others. Its preferences shape every outcome. Bias is baked in by design.
"When one model judges the rest, you get that model's opinion. Not the best answer."
Our Approach
No dedicated judge. Every model competes and reviews anonymously. The best answer wins on merit, not opinion.
"The democratic council decides. No single model controls the outcome."
Four Experts. Every Strength Covered.
We selected the four highest-benchmarked AI models in the world. Each one brings a genuine specialty. For any question, the right expert rises to the top.
Scout
GPT-5.2
Vision specialist and multimodal powerhouse. Excels at image analysis, visual reasoning, and complex multimodal tasks.
Visual Intelligence
Also serves as Editor-in-Chief
Medic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Thorough reasoning with careful attention to nuance. Strongest at safety-critical analysis and edge case detection.
Analytical Depth
Navigator
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Deep research and strategic planning. Handles massive context windows and excels at long-form analysis and synthesis.
Strategic Planning
Ranger
Grok 4.1 Fast
Unconventional thinking and rapid problem-solving. Brings creative angles that other models miss entirely.
Creative Edge
How the Council Thinks
A four-stage pipeline executed server-side. From question to answer in under 40 seconds. Fully transparent. Fully deterministic.
Independent Responses
No collaboration. No influence.
Each model receives the question and generates a complete answer on its own. No shared context. No chain-of-thought passing. No compromise. Four independent perspectives from four different architectures.
Anonymous Peer Review
Blind ranking. No favoritism.
Each model reviews all four answers anonymously. The answers are labeled A, B, C, D and shuffled differently for each reviewer. No model can recognize its own answer or play favorites. They rank each answer for Accuracy and Insight.
Chairman Election
Mathematical scoring. Merit wins.
Rankings are aggregated using a weighted Borda count where Accuracy counts double. The highest-scoring answer is elected Chairman for this specific query. No permanent leaders. Every question is a fresh competition. The right expert wins each time.
Command Synthesis
Decide first. Then improve.
Scout (GPT-5.2) serves as permanent Editor-in-Chief. It takes the Chairman's winning answer as the foundation and incorporates genuine improvements from the other three advisors. The result is a decisive, polished, expert-level response.
Borda Count Leaderboard
Accuracy counts double. The formula is transparent and deterministic. No opinions. Just math.
Council Score Formula
CouncilScore = (Accuracy × 2) + (Insight × 1)
Tie-Breaker Protocol: If two answers share the same CouncilScore, the one with higher Accuracy Points wins. If still tied, higher Insight Points wins. If still tied (extremely rare), alphabetical label order is the final deterministic fallback.
Consistent Delivery. Unbiased Decisions.
The council already decided which answer is best. Democratically. Anonymously. Without bias. Now Scout delivers it.
Editor-in-Chief: Scout (GPT-5.2)
Permanent synthesizer. Takes the Chairman's winning answer and polishes it.
Why a permanent editor? This is an intentional design choice for output quality, not decision-making. The council already voted. The winner was chosen without bias. Scout's job is to ensure the final answer is consistently formatted, well-organized, and polished. Think of it like a newsroom: reporters investigate, the editorial board picks the best story, and the copy editor makes sure it reads well. The editor doesn't pick the story. They deliver it.
Chairman's Answer
The winning response becomes the foundation. This answer earned its place through anonymous peer review.
Advisor Improvements
Genuinely helpful clarifications and edge cases from the other three models are incorporated.
Conflicts Resolved
Where models disagree, the conflict is addressed explicitly. Nothing gets hidden or smoothed over.
Final Answer
A single, decisive, expert-level response streamed to the user. Consistent format every time.
The critical distinction:
Others combine answers before deciding which is best.
We decide first, then refine.
Experience the Council
Four of the world's smartest AI models. Anonymous peer review. No single judge. No bias. Ask a question and see the difference for yourself.
No conversations stored. Sessions are ephemeral. Privacy first, always.